检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈国祥[1] 何兵[1] 肖丽[1] 常福辰[1] 魏锦城[1]
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学生物系
出 处:《云南植物研究》1998年第3期334-338,共5页Acta Botanica Yunnanica
基 金:江苏省教委自然科学基金
摘 要:比较分析了水生植物睡莲(NymphaeaalbaL.)及陆生植物菠菜(Spinaciaoleracea)类囊体膜PSI、PSII电子传递活性、吸收光谱、室温荧光发射光谱等光化学特性及类囊体膜的多肽组分。结果显示:睡莲类囊体膜PSI、PSII电子传递活性相对较弱,分别为菠菜的6021%和7082%,其室温吸收光谱蓝紫光区域(430nm)吸收较弱,没有明显的吸收峰,红光区域的吸收光谱和菠菜相似;睡莲类囊体膜685nm处具较强的荧光发射峰。但530~780nm区域无发射肩峰。类囊体多肽组分和菠菜相比较存在明显的差别。The electron transfer rates, room temperature absorption spectrum, fluoresence emission spectrum and polypeptide compositions were observed for thylakoid membrane from hydrophyte Nymphaea alba L and terrestrial plant Spinacia oleracea L. Some experimental results are as follows: (1)Nymphaea alba had a lower electron transfer activity than Spinacia oleracea. (2)Nymphaea alba had one fluorescence emission peak at 685 nm, and fluorescence emission peak at the 730~780 nm was absent(Fig. 1) (3)Nymphaea alba was less capable for light absorption at 400~500 nm than that of Spinacia oleracea(Fig. 2). (4)Nymphaea alba thylakoid membrane polypeptide components were distinct from that of the Spinacia oleracea (Fig. 3, 4) as shown by analysis of thylakoid membrane polypeptides using SDS-PAGE.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222