不同消毒方法对手术室空气消毒效果的监测  

Monitoring the Air Sterilization Effect in Operating Room by Different Sterilization Methods

作　　者：刘秀玲[1] 张秀萍[1] 赵楠[1] 

机构地区：[1]本钢总医院医院感染管理科,辽宁本溪117000

出　　处：《中华医院感染学杂志》2009年第19期2581-2583,共3页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology

摘　　要：目的比较不同空气消毒方法对手术室的空气消毒效果。方法分别采用4种消毒方法对手术室空气进行消毒、采样监测,并进行评价。结果过氧乙酸熏蒸、单纯紫外线照射、过氧乙酸熏蒸加紫外线照射、紫外线循环风空气消毒机的空气消毒合格率分别为79.17%、62.79%、79.63%、97.22%,紫外线循环风的消毒效果好于前3种。结论非层流净化手术室应使用紫外线循环风消毒机进行空气消毒。OBJECTIVE To compare the air sterilization effect of in operating room used by different air sterilization methods. METHODS Four types sterilization methods were used to operating room air. Then sampling monitoring and evaluation were done. RESULTS The qualification rate of air sterilization were 79. 17%, 62. 79%, 79. 63%, 97.22% in peroxyaeetic acid fumigating, simple ultraviolet radiation, peroxyacetic acid fumigating combined with simple ultraviolet radiation, ultraviolet light circulation wind air sterilization machine, respectively. The sterilization effect of ultraviolet light circulation wind was better than the others. CONCLUSIONS Ultraviolet light circulation wind air sterilization machine can be used to air sterilization in non-laminar air flow purify operating room.

关 键 词：手术室 空气消毒 监测 

分 类 号：R187[医药卫生—流行病学]