论知识产权国际立法的后TRIPS发展  

The Post-TRIPS Development of the International Intellectual Property Lawmaking

作　　者：王太平[1,2] 熊琦[3] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学知识产权学院 [2]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心 [3]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2009年第5期134-141,共8页Global Law Review

基　　金：湖南省社科基金项目<知识产权客体的理论范畴>(项目编号:07YBB070)的中期成果;"中国博士后科学基金资助项目"资助

摘　　要：TRIPS协议生效以来,发达国家及其知识产权产业集团继续推动着国际知识产权扩张,发展中国家和全球市民社会组织则开始反抗TRIPS协议。在后TRIPS时代,知识产权国际立法在立法趋势、立法体制、立法内容、立法主体和立法形式方面表现出不同以往的诸多特点,其原因在于知识产权国际立法的控制与反控制力量激烈博弈的继续、TRIPS协议的压力、发展中国家的体制转换策略、经济全球化、市场化、跨国资本主义的发展、TRIPS协议的立法特点等。后TRIPS时代的知识产权国际立法变得更为公平和平衡,但知识产权国际立法日趋复杂化,知识产权的国际保护更为不稳定和不确定。Since coming into force of the TRIPS agreement, developed countries and their IP industrial groups have continued to push for the expansion of the scope of international IP while developing countries and global civil TRIPS agreements. International IP society organizations having been organizing opposition to the lawmaking in post- TRIPS era has displayed many new features in terms of the legislative trend, legislative regime, legislative content, legislative subject and form of lawmaking. There are many different causes for this change, including the continued fierce struggle between pro and anti - control forces in international IP lawmaking, the pressure from TRIPS, the developing countries＇ strategy of institutional transformation, economic globalization, marketization, development of transnational capitalism, and the legislative characteristics of TRIPS. The post-TRIPS international IP lawmaking is becoming fairer and more balanced than ever before. However, due to the developing countries＇ strategy of institutional transformation, the participation by private sectors and the emergence of a large number of soft laws, post - TRIPS International IP lawmaking also becomes more and more complicated and there is increasing instability and uncertainty in the international protection of IP.

关 键 词：TRIPS协议 后TRIPS发展 知识产权国际立法 

分 类 号：D997.1[政治法律—国际法学]