检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:牟林[1] 韩晓日[1] 于成广 聂大杭[1] 吴正超[1]
机构地区:[1]沈阳农业大学土地与环境学院,辽宁省农业资源与环境重点实验室,辽宁沈阳110161 [2]辽宁省地质矿产调查院,辽宁沈阳110032
出 处:《植物营养与肥料学报》2009年第5期1179-1188,共10页Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers
基 金:辽宁省自然科学基金(20062113);辽宁省"十一五"重大攻关项目(2006215005);辽宁省高校科技攻关计划(05L380);沈阳农业大学青年科研基金(2005034)资助
摘 要:探讨了不同无机矿物用于膜材料后的包膜复合肥氮素养分释放特性、生物效应和评价方法。采用了土壤淋溶和土壤盆栽试验两种方法。试验方法的不同造成土壤盆栽与淋溶试验中各处理养分释放拟合曲线的差异。两种方法的试验结果都能说明:无机矿物材料能有效地保持N素养分较长时间处于NH_4^+-N形态,减少了因转化为NO_3^--N形态造成的养分淋溶损失,但是各种材料彼此间存在一定的差异。盆栽试验中养分累计释放量与释放速率虽然快于作物的生理需求,但是受矿物材料和土壤缓冲作用的影响,作物氮素供应状况良好。与普通复合肥相比,各无机矿物用于包膜肥后能显著提高氮素利用率。蒙脱土效果最好,其次为高岭土,且差异显著。滑石粉、硅粉、硅藻土与前两者相比效果稍差,差异显著,但三者间差异不显著。无机矿物材料的耐水程度,养分吸附、固定能力和离子交换量等理化性质会影响包膜肥的养分释放性能。对于膜层疏松、耐水性差、主要靠养分吸附和固定机理控释的包膜肥来说,采用土壤作为养分释放介质更接近真实释放性能。评价包膜肥料的性能应该充分考虑养分形态、膜材特性、包膜工艺、土壤环境、供试作物等各方面因素,重点在"肥料-土壤-作物"系统中考察,从多种角度制定不同方案,通过多种方法综合评价其缓释效果。This paper was to explore the N nutrient release characteristics, N uptake and use efficiency of Chinese cabbage and evaluation method of compound fertilizers coated with different minerals. Soil leaching and pot experiment methods were adopted. An inconsistent dynamics curve was observed using different methods. However, the results obtained under both methods showed that the using inorganic minerals could keep N as NH4+-N for a long time,consequently reduce the risk of NO3--N losses. But the effects of all the materials were not consistent. Although the accumulated amount or releasing rate of N was faster than the requirement of Chinese cabbage, the nutrients supplied was quite rational owing to the mineral and soil buffer capacity. Comparing to the common compound fertilizer,the N use efficiency of all the mineral-coated fertilizer was improved significantly. The effiect of applying Montmorillonite on N efficiency was the best, followed by Kaolinite. The effects of French chalk, Microsilica and Kieselgur on N efficiency were significantly lower than that of Montmorillonite and Kaolinite, but there were not significant different from each other. The physicochemical properties of mineral materials, such as water resistance, nutrient absorption and fixation, ion exchange capacity affected the nutrients release efficiency of coated-fertilizer. Using soil as release media might be closer to the truly release properties for the coated fertilizers depending on nutrient absorption and fixation mechanisms. All the factors, including nutrient forms, coated material properties, making technology, soil condition, tested plant etc, should be considered thoroughly for the slow/controlled fertilizers evaluation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200