我国不宜在涉外民商事审判中引入禁诉令制度——以禁诉令的目标与效果为视角  

Applying Anti-suit Injunctions in Foreign Commercial Trial is Not Suitable in China:A Perspective from the Objective and Effects of Applying Anti-suit Injunctions

作　　者：徐昶[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第3期57-61,共5页Journal of Nanjing Tech University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：禁诉令制度起源于英国,在英美法国家司法实践中运用较多。目前,适用禁诉令的条件趋向严格,一般只在存在有效仲裁协议的场合,法院才可能以在外国法院起诉违背仲裁协议为由签发。中国是否应当引入该制度争议颇大。禁诉令必须同非方便原则同时存在,中国缺乏适用禁诉令的法律基础;适用禁诉令制度违背中国的法律传统,和国际趋势不符;适用禁诉令制度带来的弊大于利;不适用禁诉令制度引发的负面影响则可以通过若干替代性措施得以弥补。The tradition using anti-suit injunctions in intemational civil and commercial litigation is derived from England and now it plays an increasingly important role in judicial practice of England and the United States. At present, strict precondition is required if the court wants to issue an anti-suit injunction. Only when there is an effective arbitration agreement between the parties can the court issue an anti-suit injunction to protect the arbitration agreement. Whether China should introduce this theory is in debate. The reason why we cannot take this risk includes that： first, non-convenience forum theory is not acknowledged in China; second, it is not consistent with our tradition and international trend; third, the disadvantage adopting it overrides the merit of it; and last but not un-imporant, some other measures can be taken to compensate negative influences of not using injunctions.

关 键 词：禁诉令 仲裁协议 非方便法院原则 

分 类 号：D997.3[政治法律—国际法学]