法官断案思路初探  

Judge's Strategy of Settling Lawsuits

作　　者：冀莹[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《温州大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第5期55-60,共6页Journal of Wenzhou University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：现实中法官审判案件是对法律正义、社会效果等因素的综合权衡,与传统三段论模式存在较大差异。法官的裁判解释本质上是法官进行价值衡平的过程,是法律解释的关键。法律解释方法与法官审判时考量的因素之间存在差异,应当区分开来。在充分发挥法官主观能动性的同时,还应强调对法官自由裁量权的有效约束,法律原则、司法解释和程序性条款都将起到一定的规范作用。司法机关的判决会影响到法治进程,法官作为真正的法律实践者,应起到有效调控法律与现实的作用。In practice, judge ought to think comprehensively about all the factors, including justice, social effects and other factors, in adjudication. This is quite different from the traditional syllogism. To be precise, the judge＇s interpretation is the process of judge＇s searching for value-balancing and the key of the interpretation of law. Law-interpreting methods are different from the elements considered in adjudication They should be clearly separated from each other. While giving full play to judge＇s initiative, restriction on the judge＇s right of discretion should be stressed. In this process, legal principles, law interpretation and procedural clauses would play their parts. Determinations of the judicial organs would have influences on the implementation of law in China. So, judges, as real exercisers of law, ought to effectively balance the relationship between law and the reality

关 键 词：法官 法律解释 解释方法 自由裁量权 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]