检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺康宁[1] 张学培[1] 赵云杰[1] 魏天兴[1]
机构地区:[1]北京林业大学水土保持学院
出 处:《北京林业大学学报》1998年第6期7-13,共7页Journal of Beijing Forestry University
基 金:中日黄土高原治山技术培训项目
摘 要:应用自记综合气象观测塔,对刺槐和油松林进行了以蒸散研究为目的的防护林热收支特性研究.结果表明:1994年生长季日平均实际太阳辐射量为7~24MJ·m-2;刺槐林林冠对太阳辐射的反射率为15%,油松林的反射率在10%以下,反射率的差异是造成两林分净辐射收支相差1~3MJ·m-2的主要原因.春夏两季林分获取的净辐射均由约70%~80%的太阳辐射转换而来;秋季的转换率约为60%,油松林的转换比刺槐约大1%~5%;防护林地区每天获取的净辐射量中,消耗于蒸散的潜热通量部分,在春夏秋三季分别为65%,82%和85%,油松林比刺槐林偏高1%左右;用于气温变化的显热通量部分在春季约占32%,夏秋为15%左右,其中刺槐林中显热通量部分在春夏两季所占的百分比相对油松要高出4%~5%;刺槐林地用于土壤热流量部分的热量在5~9月约占净辐射的1%~3%,油松林为2%~5%;1994年生长季刺槐林蒸散量为519mm,油松林为597mm.Based on the observation of micrometeorological tower at Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus tabulaeformis stands in Jixian Country,Shanxi Province,a research on heat energy budget characteristics was carried out form May to Oct.in 1994.The results are as follows: In growing season the actual daily solar radiation was 7~24MJ·m -2 ; the albedo of Robinia pseudoacacia canopy was 15% and Pinus tabulaeformis below 10%.This diversity led to a difference of net radiation budget about 1~3MJ·m -2 between these two stands. Net radiation corresponded to approximately 70%~80% of total solar radiation in both stands in spring and summer, 60% in autumn. Among daily net radiation budget, the part of latent heat be used up in evapotranspiration was 65% in spring, 82% and 85% in summer and autumn respectively, 1% more at Pinus tabulaeformis stand that Robinia pseudoacacia stand. The part be expended in sensible heat was 32% in spring, 15% in other seasons. The soil thermal flux was 1%~3% of net radiation in Robinia pseudoacacia stand and 2%~5% in Pinus tabulaeformis stand.The evapotranspiration in growing season was, 519 mm in Robinia pseudoacacia stand and 597 mm in Pinus tabulaeformis stand.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26