检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建省金鸡山工人温泉疗养院
出 处:《中国疗养医学》1998年第4期11-12,共2页Chinese Journal of Convalescent Medicine
摘 要:目的比较超短波、动态干扰电、牵引综合治疗腰椎间盘突出症与单纯动态干扰电治疗该症的疗效。方法第1组48例采用综合治疗腰部或腰部与患侧坐骨神经走行区。第2组30例用单纯动态干扰电治疗做对照组。结果综合治疗组结果:治愈4例,占833%,显效22例,占4583%,好转22例,占4583%,总有效率100%。对照组总有效率933%。经统计学处理,χ2=1053,P<0.01,差异有非常显著性。结论显效率和总有效率,综合组明显高于对照组,说明采用综合治疗。Objective Compave the curative effect on treating the herniation of lumbar interverrebral by comprehensive way of ultrashort wave,dynamic jamming eletricity and traction ,and by single way of dynamic jamming eletricity. Methods The first gronp 48 cases,treat patients waist or part between waist and sciatic nerve in the comprehensive way .The second group 30 cases,wse the way of dynamic jamming electricity as comparation. Results The first group,4 cases cured ,which wakes up 8.33 per cent of the total.22 cases had a notable lurative effect ,which makes up 45.83 per cent,and the rest 22 cases took a favohrable turn,this covers 45.83 per cent of the group,so the total curative effect of this group is 100 per cent ,After conducting by statistics process,χ 2=10.53,P<0 01.which shows marked difference between the two groups. Conclusion The first group shows higher curative effect than the second group.The above result indicates the comprehensive way is the better choice on treating the disease.
分 类 号:R681.530.5[医药卫生—骨科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222