合宪性推定原则：一个被误解的概念  

Doctrine of Presumption of Constitutionality Revisited

作　　者：柳建龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国青年政治学院法律系,北京100089

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2009年第10期45-51,113,共8页Zhejiang Social Sciences

摘　　要：对合宪性推定原则一直以来存在误解,认为其即(限定)合宪性解释。本文通过对合宪性推定原则概念的梳理,说明合宪性推定既非合宪性解释,亦非法律推定意义上的推定。合宪性推定原则是司法谦抑的要求,它主要决定了在宪法诉讼中由谁来承担证明责任的问题。最后,考察了相关争论并予以批驳,进一步明确了合宪性原则的理论基础和存在的必要性。Presumption of constitutionality doctrine has long been misunderstood and misused by the mainland scholars and regard as the same to doctrine of harmonized interpretation. The article makes it clear that there are essential differences between the two doctrines. Moreover,Presumption of constitutionality doctrine is not a legal presumption. For the very purpose above,the article also focuses on the grounds and necessity for the doctrine.

关 键 词：合宪性推定原则 司法谦抑 举证责任 

分 类 号：D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]