论美国“购买美国货”条款与WTO协定的一致性——WTO成员可能的诉讼依据  

The Consistency of US "Buy American" Clause with WTO Agreements:the Legal Basis of Potential WTO Litigations

作　　者：李晓玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《河北法学》2009年第11期180-184,共5页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：2009年初,美国国会经济刺激提案中的"购买美国货"条款,遭到了欧共体、加拿大等贸易伙伴的强烈反对,甚至以诉诸WTO相威胁。经过半个多月的纷争,该条款进行了修正,规定其适用须与美国在国际协定下的义务保持一致,并成为美国法律。但对WTO法理与实践的研究表明,本项修正并不能使美国完全免于WTO诉讼风险,包括中国在内的其他WTO成员仍有寻求WTO救济的法律根据。In the beginning of 2009, the ＂Buy American＂ clause of US congress economic stimulus bill was severely criticized by EC, Canada and other trade partners, which threatened with WTO litigations. As the result of half a month＇ s wrangles, this clause was revised and finally became the law of the US. However, s research on WTO jurisprudence and practice reveals that this amendment could not shelter the US from WTO litigation risks ; China and other WTO members still possess valid legal basis to challenge the WTO consistency of the revised ＂Buy American＂ Clause.

关 键 词：经济刺激法案 购买美国货 政府采购 补贴 

分 类 号：D822.371.2[政治法律—政治学] F741.2[政治法律—外交学]