检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山大学环境科学系
出 处:《环境科学学报》1998年第5期517-521,共5页Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
基 金:国家自然科学基金;广东省自然科学基金
摘 要:通过连续提取方法研究了土壤固相组成对酸沉降敏感性的影响.结果表明,不同土壤质子缓冲反应的类型不同,因此缓冲容量及缓冲强度等指标也有较大差异.有机质对酸缓冲反应存在双重影响,取决于土壤原始pH值及盐基组成状态,活性氧化物酸性水解是低pH条件下重要的质子缓冲反应,而晶态氧化物也参与了缓冲反应,但受制于活化反应速率.除了土壤固相组成、种类和含量外,各组成之间的结合方式和相互作用也是影响酸缓冲性能的重要原因.The effects of soil solid components on soil sensitive to acid deposition were studied by sequential extraction method.The soils were collected from the main acid deposition region in south China including red soils,latored soils,latosoils,yellow soils (ferrallisols),rendzinas,red limestone soils,coastal solonchak and vertisols.The results indicate that the acid buffering capacity and acid buffering intensity differ greatly among soils studied due to the difference in types of proton buffering reactions.Two kinds of effects of organic matter revealed depend on soil original pH and exchangeable cation composition.The hydrolysis of the activated oxides was a very important proton buffering reaction at low pH.The crystalline oxides also took part in the buffering reactions,but restricted by the rate of activation reactions of oxides.Meanwhile,the interaction and combination of soil solid components also played a significant role on soil acid buffering capacity.
分 类 号:X825[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229