检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:严吕芳[1] 饶晓玲[1] 何克芝[1] 刘美玲[1]
机构地区:[1]同济医科大学附属同济医院
出 处:《山西护理杂志》1998年第6期257-258,共2页
摘 要:选择40例住院病人随机分为A、B两组,A组用双侧孔吸痰管分别采用常规吸痰法和试验吸痰法吸痰;B组用单侧孔吸痰管分别采用常规吸痰法和试验吸痰法吸痰。结果显示:常规吸痰法效果明显优于试验吸痰法,经统计学处理差异有显著性(P<0.05),两种吸痰管对吸痰效果的影响,经统计学处理差异无显著性(P>0.05)。Fourty patients were randomly divided into groups A and B.Sputum-aspirating tubes with bilateral orifice(group A) and with unilateral orifice(group B) were used to aspirate thesputum with both routine and test methods respectively.Results showed that the sputum-aspirating effect of routine method was notably better than that of test method.There was statistically significant difference between the two methods (P<0.05),and no difference between the two types of tubes(P>0.05).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28