加拿大对华半导体冷热箱反倾销与反补贴税案述评  

Case Review Respecting Dumping and Subsidizing of Thermoelectric Containers of China by Canada

作　　者：黄文旭[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学

出　　处：《国际贸易问题》2009年第11期53-61,共9页Journal of International Trade

基　　金：湖南省社会科学基金项目<国际补贴与反补贴立法与实践比较研究>的阶段性成果之一(课题编号:03YB07)

摘　　要：加拿大是第一个对我国产品征收反补贴税的国家,在最近的5年里已对我国发起了8起反倾销与反补贴合并调查。加拿大对华半导体冷热箱反倾销与反补贴税案是一起较新的案件,并于2008年末最终裁定对原产于我国的半导体冷热箱征收反倾销税与反补贴税。边境服务署在最终裁定中确定了38项补贴项目。虽然最终只认定了3项补贴项目使合作出口商获得了利益,但对于非合作出口商,边境服务署通过部长指定程序裁定其获得了所有38项补贴项目下的利益①。在本案的最终裁定中,非合作出口商的倾销幅度与补贴量大大高于合作出口商。本案再次证明,面对国外反贸易救济调查,积极应诉肯定能获得比不应诉更有利的裁决。Canada is the first country collecting Countervailing Duties on goods originating in or exported from China. Canada has initiated 8 investigations respecting the dumping and subsidizing of the goods originating in or exported from China in recent 5 years. The case respecting the dumping and subsidizing of thermoelectric-containers originating in or exported from China is a new case and the final determination was made in the end of 2008. According to the final determination, the anti-dumping and countervailing duty must be payable. The CBSA identified 38 subsidy programs in the final determination. The CBSA has determined that the cooperative exporter received subsidies under only 3 programs and the non-cooperative exporters received subsidies under all the 38 programs. In the final determination of this case, the margin of dumping and the amount of subsidy for non-cooperative exporters is much higher than cooperative exporter. This case demonstrated once more that respond positively in trade remedy investigations can make an enterprise receive a better result.

关 键 词：反倾销 反补贴 加拿大 贸易救济 半导体冷热箱 

分 类 号：F743[经济管理—国际贸易] D922.295[经济管理—产业经济]