生化黄腐酸与常见抑菌药品的抑菌效果比较  

Comparison of Antibacterial Effect between Biochemical Fulvic Acid and Common Antibacterial Drugs

作　　者：高金岗[1] 王锐萍[1] 郝清玉[1] 黄维钢[1] 

机构地区：[1]海南师范大学生命科学学院海南省热带动植物生态学重点实验室,海口571158

出　　处：《腐植酸》2009年第5期18-23,共6页Humic Acid

摘　　要：通过生化黄腐酸对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌、苏云金杆菌、枯草杆菌的抑制作用和苯酚、高锰酸钾、乙酰螺旋霉素片及头孢拉定胶囊4种药品对上述4种菌的抑菌效果的比较,发现生化黄腐酸对上述4种菌均有明显的抑制作用,但其抑菌效果比其他4种药品弱。The inhibitory effect of biochemical fulvic acid on Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coil, Bacillus thuringlensis and Bacillus subtilis, and the comparison of its effect with KMnO4, C6H5-OH, acetylspiramycin tablets and cephalosporin capsules on above four bacteria were investigated. The results showed that the biochemical fulvic acid had obvious inhibitory effect on the four bacteria, but its inhibitory effect was weaker than the other four common antibacterial drugs.

关 键 词：生化黄腐酸 抑菌剂 抑菌效果 

分 类 号：R96[医药卫生—药理学]