检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周兰清[1] 潘家华[1] 喻卓[1] 阚瑞媛[1] 刘苓[1] 张瑞云[1] 梁立权[1]
机构地区:[1]昆明医学院附属第一医院心内科
出 处:《中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志》1998年第4期186-187,共2页Chinese Journal of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology
摘 要:对两种临时心脏起搏方法的效果和并发症作一分析。173例严重心律失常患者分别采用两种床旁临时起搏方法:即用球囊飘浮电极经静脉心内膜起搏169例,用钢丝电极剑突下经皮穿刺心内膜起搏4例。结果:用球囊飘浮电极经静脉心内膜起搏全部成功,起搏7(1~31)天,电极脱位6例经重新安置电极后恢复起搏;穿刺损伤胸导管1例。用钢丝电极剑突下经皮穿刺心内膜起搏4例,1例成功;3例因心脏停搏时间太久而失败。结论:两种临时心脏起搏方法急救不宜搬动的严重心律失常病人均有效。The purpose of this report was to analysis and discuss two kinds of different emergent bedside temporary cardiac pacing in 173 patients with serious arrhythmia and heart diseases,including transvenous method with balloon tipped electrode in 169 cases and transthoracic cardiac pacing electrode kid in 4 cases.Tranvenous temporary cardiac pacing with balloon tipped electrode was successful in all cases.Pacing time was 1~31 days,mean 7 days.Complication included electrode dislocation in 6 cases,lymphagion damaged in one case.Transluminal subxiphoid pacing with wire lead was successful in one of 4 cases.The results show that the two methods are effective for serious arrhythmic patients.
分 类 号:R541.705[医药卫生—心血管疾病] R654.2[医药卫生—内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15