不同尿液沉渣检测方法的成本-效果分析  

Cost-effecticeness analysis of different assays for urinary sediment

作　　者：陈文捷[1] 张圣华[1] 吴晓蔓[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州医学院第二附属医院检验科,广州510260

出　　处：《检验医学与临床》2009年第20期1697-1698,1700,共3页Laboratory Medicine and Clinic

摘　　要：目的对不同尿液沉渣的检测方法进行成本-效果分析,找出成本低、效率高的检测方法。方法分别用UF-100尿沉渣分析仪、IQ200尿沉渣分析仪、DiaSys尿沉渣工作站检测尿液中有形成分,同时按各类成本的特征做实际测算。结果3种方法检测结果符合性良好(P>0.05);仪器及试剂耗材成本以UF-100尿沉渣分析仪和IQ200尿沉渣分析仪较高,人力成本则以DiaSys尿沉渣工作站最高。结论UF-100和IQ200尿沉渣分析仪适合大批量标本的筛查;DiaSys尿沉渣工作站适合少量标本的单独分析;DiaSys与UF-100、IQ200对可疑标本联合使用。Objective To research the quality assays of low cost and high efficiency for urinary sediment. Methods Urinary sediment was detected with the UF-100,IQ200 and DiaSys urine sediment quantitative analyzer, and the cost-effectiveness of the assays was determined. Results The compliance of three methods was good （P〉 0.05）. The instrument and reagent cost of UF-100 and IQ200 was higher; the labor cost of DiaSys was highest in three analyzers. Conclusion UF-100 and IQ200 suit for the mass specimens screening; DiaSys suits for the few specimens analysis; the doubtful specimens should be analysed by DiaSys combinned with UF-100 or IQ200.

关 键 词：尿液沉渣 成本-效果分析 IQ200尿沉渣分析仪 UF-100尿沉渣分析仪 DiaSys尿沉渣 工作站 

分 类 号：R191.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] R446.121[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]