检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学经济学院,上海200433 [2]上海市发展改革研究院,上海200032
出 处:《中国卫生政策研究》2009年第9期33-39,共7页Chinese Journal of Health Policy
基 金:国家自然科学基金(编号:70573024);复旦大学985项目;上海哲社青年课题(编号:2009EJB008)
摘 要:医疗领域的所有制和市场竞争问题是卫生经济学研究的热点之一。本文分析了现有的研究成果,主要考察两个问题的研究和所得到的结论,一是医疗服务由政府或私人提供会产生什么差异,二是医疗市场竞争会产生什么结果。总体上看,现有实证研究表明不同所有制医院在成本、质量、效率等方面的差异并没有明确的结论。而竞争在很多情况下可以起到降低医疗费用的作用,但这一作用的前提是医院激励机制的改变。本文对中国医疗改革的政策含义在于,医疗市场的所有制模式需要根据国情而定,但市场机制的作用是不可忽视的。The ownership and market competition is one of the hottest topics in health economics. This paper reviews the related theoretic and empirical studies and explores the answers for two questions: What are the differences between public and private provision in health care? What are the outcomes of market competition in health care market? Generally speaking, there is no conclusive result about the impacts of ownership on cost, quality, and effiency. However, competition does have an impact on the costs conditional on the changing of incentive of hospitals. The implication to China health care reform is that the ownership structure in health care should be in accordance with the specific situation of China, but the role of competition should not be ignored.
分 类 号:R197.322[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147