不同养老方式下老年人日常生活能力的比较研究  

Comparative Study on Activities of Daily Living of Elderly

作　　者：张保利[1] 兰志敏[1] 韩学青[1] 陈建[1] 李娟[1] 冯锋[1] 杨甫德[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京回龙观医院老年科19区,北京市100096

出　　处：《中国康复理论与实践》2009年第10期988-990,共3页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice

基　　金：北京回龙观医院重点科研项目基金支持(青-07)

摘　　要：目的探讨社会养老和家庭养老两种方式对老年人日常生活能力的影响。方法采用ADL(日常生活能力)、PADL(生理性日常生活能力)、IADL(工具性日常生活能力)量表及自制的一般情况调查量表,对662例年龄为60～100岁社会养老和620例年龄为60～98岁北京城区家庭养老者进行评定。结果两组的ADL得分没有显著性差异(P>0.05)。ADL与年龄(OR=3.05,95%CI:1.805～2.935)、教育程度(OR=2.01,95%CI:1.512～2.544)、健康状况(OR=1.25,95%CI:1.524～2.012)有明显的相关性。结论年龄是影响日常生活能力的最重要的因素(OR=3.05,95%CI:1.805～2.935),不同养老方式下老年人的日常生活能力没有明显的不同。Objective To compare the activities of daily living（ADL） of the elderly in different styles of providing.Methods 662 subjects were in range of 60～100 years old living in the organization for the aged and 620 subjects were in the range of 60～98 years old living at home from Beijing urban.They were evaluated with the ADL rating scales and a self-designed health status questionnaire.Results The total scores of ADL were not significantly difference between the elderly living at home and living in the organization（t=-0.299,P〉0.05）.But age（OR=3.05,95%CI：1.805～2.935）,educational level（OR=2.01,95%CI：1.512～2.544）,and physical health（OR=1.25,95%CI：1.524～2.012） were related to ADL.Conclusion Age is the important factor affecting ADL（OR=3.05,95%CI：1.805～2.935）,but ADL of the elderly in different styles of providing is not significantly difference.

关 键 词：老年人 养老方式 日常生活活动能力 

分 类 号：R197.7[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]