“一体制”与“分体制”:行政犯罪案件侦查体制完善之路径选择  

"Integrated Mode" or "Separated Mode"——A Choice for Improving the Constitution of Administrative Crime Investigation

作　　者：李文军[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海市闵行区人民检察院,上海201100

出　　处：《公安理论与实践（上海公安高等专科学校学报）》2009年第5期28-32,共5页Journal of Shanghai Police College

摘　　要：公安、海关等行政执法机关集查处行政违法与行政犯罪职能于一身的"一体制",有利于提高打击犯罪的效率,形成行政执法与刑事司法内部的衔接与案件移送机制,并且由承担行政犯罪侦查职能的行政执法机关与检察机关之间形成实质性的配合制约与监督关系,建议借鉴海关缉私部门的模式在相关领域试行"一体制"侦查模式。Administrative enforcement organs such as public security agencies and customs integrate the functions of investigating administrative offenses and administrative crimes into one body, which is beneficial to improving the efficiency of cracking down on crimes and creating the linkup and case delivery organism between administrative enforcement department and criminal judicature. Moreover, the cooperative, restraining and supervising relations between administrative enforcement organs in charge of investigating administrative crimes and procuratorates can be really built up. It is suggested that we should draw on the experience of customs and try out the integrated investigating mode in some related fields.

关 键 词：行政犯罪 侦查模式 一体制 分体制 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]