检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省江门市新会区人民医院儿科,529100
出 处:《当代医学》2009年第31期38-39,共2页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的观察中西医结合治疗(治疗组)与单纯西药治疗(对照组)小儿肾病综合征的临床疗效。方法回顾分析90例肾病综合征(NS)患儿治疗情况,分别用中医分期辨证结合西医治疗及单纯西药治疗,观察两组总有效率及不良反应发生率。结果治疗组总有效率95.45%,对照组总有效率80.43%。两组总有效率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗组不良反应发生率为18.18%,对照组不良反应发生率为63.04%,两组不良反应发生率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论中西医结合治疗肾炎性肾病综合征的疗效明显优于单纯西药组,且可有效降低激素治疗不良反应发生率。Objective Observation of traditional Chinese and western medicine (treatment group) with western medicine alone (control group) in children with nephrotic syndrome in clinical efficacy. Methods Retrospective analysis of 90 cases of children with NS treatment, differentiation stages, respectively, combined with traditional Chinese medicine and Western Medicine Western medicine therapy and simple treatment, the total effective rate were observed and the incidence of adverse reactions. Results The total effective rate in treatment group 95.45%, total effective rate of the control group 80.43%. The total efficiency of the two groups were significantly different (P〈0.05), treatment group, the incidence of adverse reactions to 18.18% in the control group the incidence of adverse reactions to 63.04 percent, the incidence of adverse reactions were a very significant difference (P〈0.01). Conclusion Chinese and Western Medicine nephritis and renal syndrome significantly better than the efficacy of Western medicine group, and hormone therapy can effectively reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3