检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《广东商学院学报》2009年第5期23-29,84,共8页Journal of Guangdong University of Business Studies
基 金:广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划项目(07GD01)
摘 要:西方国家历史上出现过的慈善产品的第三配置,既有个体也有宗族类的血缘共同体和公社类的地缘共同体。在中世纪的欧洲,教会是典型的第三配置体系,到中世纪晚期,国家和世俗公益逐渐取代了教会。中国传统社会出现过的第三配置较有影响的是社邑、寺院、宗族公益组织。这些组织由于受历史、文化、政治、宗教和经济发展水平等因素的影响,表现出与西方社会慈善组织风格迥异的演进路径。由于历史的路径依赖和制度的互补性,中西方慈善制度的演变深深根植于各自的传统,产生了不同的组织制度演变形态,从路径演变到提供模式,再到慈善行为的诉求都有很大的差异。The third allocation of charitable products once prevailing in the history of western countries has three forms: individual type, bloodlineage community type and a geo-community type in the form of commune. In Europe of Middle Ages, the church was a typical third allocation system while in the late Middle Ages, the state and the secular public gradually replaced the church. City community, monasteries and clan public organization were influential third allocation that once appeared in traditional Chinese society. These organizations show distinctly different evolution path from Western social charitable organizations, due to historical, cultural, political, religious, and economic development level and other factors. Due to the dependence of historical path and institutional complementarities, the changes of Chinese and western charitable systems are deeply rooted in respective traditions, which result in the evolution of different organizational system: there are very big differences either in the path of evolution, or in the delivery model, or in the demands of charity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222