检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学城市与区域规划系
出 处:《现代城市研究》2009年第10期47-53,共7页Modern Urban Research
摘 要:当前我国城市总体规划编制日益兴起的"公众问卷调查热",正面临着几个方面的困境:1)调查面面俱到,缺乏针对性,对规划编制的作用十分有限;2)问卷的问题设计存在诸多弊病,无法解决实际问题;3)对问卷调查的使用比较盲目,调查多流于形式。究其原因,问卷调查方法自身的局限性导致调查作用有限;而公众参与途径的匮乏、城市规划核心理论的缺失和科学性的不足则是问卷调查被热捧和滥用的根源。针对这些问题,应从完善公众参与制度、完善基础资料收集制度、加强理论研究、针对专题开展调查、改良问卷设计与实施等方面进行相应改进。The public questionnaire survey, which is becoming more and more popular in urban master planning in current China, is now confronted with several plights. (1) The survey covers every field yet without pertinence, which plays a limited role in master planning; (2) There are many disadvantages in questions design, which makes it unable to solve practical problems, and (3) Questionnaire survey is usually utilized blindly with the investigation a mere formality. The reason for the plights mentioned-above is the limitation of questionnaire survey method itself, which may led to the limitations of investigation functions. On the other hand, shortage of public participation means, lack of core theory in urban planning and inadequate scientificalness are the root causes of questionnaire investigation hot and abuse. In response to these problems, improving measures should be carried out in perfecting public participation system, improving basic data collection system, strengthening the theoretical research, investigation on special topic, improving questionnaire design and implementation.
关 键 词:城市总体规划 问卷调查 公众参与 规划编制 反思 建议
分 类 号:TU984.11[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3