检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]三峡大学机械与材料学院,湖北宜昌443002
出 处:《电网与清洁能源》2009年第10期43-47,共5页Power System and Clean Energy
基 金:三峡大学研究生科研创新基金资助项目(2009004)
摘 要:输电线静态平衡位置找形是动力学分析的前提,找形精确与否对后续分析结果有很大影响。介绍了输电线找形中的解析法和有限元法,以某跨越档为例,分别对导线在自重和覆冰荷载下进行找形,着重分析了非均布荷载作用下这2种方法找形的差异。结果表明,均布荷载作用时,解析法和有限元法对导线静态平衡位置找形有相同的效果;非均布荷载作用时,有限元法得到的结果相对准确。The static equilibrium position form-finding is the premise of the dynamics analysis of the transmission line. and the precision of the form-finding will materially affect the resultant analysis. This paper introduces the analytic method and the finite element method used for the form-finding, anti taking alarge crossing span as an example, form-finding for conductors are made under the deadweight and with icing weight respectively, and it emphatically analyzes the differences of these two form-finding methods under the non-linear load. The results show that under the uniform distributed load, the analytic method and the finite element method have the same effect for the static equilibrium position form-findlng of the conductors while for the non-uniform load, the finite element method gives more accurate results.
分 类 号:TM752[电气工程—电力系统及自动化] TU311[建筑科学—结构工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28