名同实异——两种“城市规划”专业教育分野的必要性  

One Name Two Facts——The Necessity of Differentiating Two Kinds of Education for Urban Planning

作　　者：刘晓晖[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学建筑与城市规划学院,武汉430074

出　　处：《新建筑》2009年第5期138-140,共3页New Architecture

摘　　要：在城规专业教育中什么是城市规划的"本体"一直处于困惑之中,无论从美国还是国内的城规专业教育实情来看,困惑的焦点所在仍是"物质空间规划"和"经济、社会规划与政策制定",谁才是城市规划专业的"本体"。论述了它们是一对关系紧密但实为不同的、进而有必要有所分别的两个不同专业,已不再适宜同用一个专业名称。指出这两个专业有区分,才有合作和共同发展,也才有各自专业教育思路得以明确的前提。The “noumenon” of urban planning has always been a confusing subject in specialty education. By reviewing the education for urban planning whether in America or in China, it is seen that the confusion focus on the question that who is the “noumenon” of urban planning between “practical planning” and “economy, society and policy＇s planning”. The paper expound that they are relevant intimately but different in fact, so that need to be differentiated into two specialties and no longer be suitable to use one specialty＇s name. Then the paper point out that only on the base of being differentiated they can collaborate mutually and carry common development, and can get clear train of thought about each specialty education.

关 键 词：名与实 分野 城市规划 

分 类 号：TU-021[建筑科学—建筑理论]