检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学经济学院 [2]复旦大学世界经济研究所
出 处:《财贸经济》2009年第11期66-71,60,共7页Finance & Trade Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(批准号:07BJY012);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金项目(批准号:08JJD790138)资助;复旦大学中国经济国际竞争力研究创新基地国际环境研究项目资助
摘 要:基于GP和HL方法,我们提出改进方法探究了1995-2007年中国知识产权名义保护水平和实际保护强度。研究发现:(1)GP方法测算的1995-2007年中国知识产权保护水平显著地提高,体现出TRIPS协定约束下中国不断完善立法,已达到较高的名义保护水平。(2)HL方法修正后的保护水平明显地低于GP方法下保护水平,揭示出中国社会法制化程度和法律体系完备程度发展相对滞后。(3)经济发展水平、法治水平和知识产权执法水平是影响中国知识产权实际保护强度的重要因素。据此,本文改进方法测算的中国知识产权实际保护强度呈阶段式提高。相比来看,GP方法测算的中国知识产权保护水平偏高,而HL方法修正后的保护水平偏低;中国知识产权名义保护水平很大程度上是受立法程度的影响,而实际保护强度主要体现了执法力度的成效。本文建议通过法治教育与培训来改善中国知识产权保护的社会意识,增强民间行业协会自律约束机制,细化各执法机构的执行职能,加强司法审查,以期强化知识产权执法力度。Based on GP's and HL's approaches,we propose the modified approach to measure nominal level and actual protection strength (APS) of China's intellectual property from 1995 to 2007.The findings are that:(1) nominal level of China's IPP measured by GP approach had heightened notably from 1995 to 2007.It shows that China has continually improved IPP legislation under the TRIPS constraint,and has achieved high nominal level.(2) China's IPP level by HL approach is evidently lower than that of GP approach.It reveals that China's rule of law level and law system maturity is developed rather laggardly.(3) Economic development level,rule of law level,and implementing law level are important factors of affecting the actual protection strength of China's intellectual property.Our modified approach proves that China's APS appears an increase with a phase.By comparison,China's IPP level by GP approach is on the high side,whereas China's IPP level by HL approach is on the low side.Nominal level of China's IPP is largely influenced by the legislation level,whereas China's APS mostly embodies the effect of implementing law level.Our proposals are that China improve social consciousness of China's IPP by education and training of rule of law,enhance the self-discipline mechanism of civil guild,specify the rights and responsibilities of different enforcement institutions,strengthen the judicial review,so that strengthens the implementing law level of China's intellectual property.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.238.90