《春秋》书法对宋代史书褒贬的影响  

Influence of Chunqiu Annals to appraise of historiography in the Song Dynasty

作　　者：邓锐[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院史学研究所,北京100875

出　　处：《安徽史学》2009年第6期5-9,共5页Historical Research In Anhui

摘　　要：《春秋》是中国传统史学的一大源头,其褒贬书法通过一定的义例蕴含大义,开后世史书褒贬先河。宋代史书褒贬深受《春秋》书法影响。一方面,宋代史书在褒贬形式上多效仿《春秋》义例,主要包括纪年"冠王于正"、一字寓褒贬、常事不书、讳书和书义理之实等;另一方面,宋代史书在褒贬思想上也继承和发展了《春秋》大义,主要包括"正名"、"尊王"、"攘夷"和"正统"等。As a source of later historiography, Chunqiu Annals had a significant impact on appraise of historiography in the Song Dynasty. On one hand, historians of Song Dynasty imitate explanatory notes of Chunqiu Annals when they write their own history records. These explanatory notes include the way of counting the years, the way to appraise, special explanatory notes, the way to discover the truth of justice, dodge. On the other hand, the thought of Chunqiu Annals instruct historians of Song Dynasty to write history records. Those thought include nominal rectification, respect to emperors, depreciate barbaric nationalities, orthodox.

关 键 词：《春秋》义例 《春秋》大义 史书褒贬 宋代 

分 类 号：K244[历史地理—历史学] K245[历史地理—中国史]