检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张维权[1] 初国新[1] 黄兴[1] 吴祥才[1] 张丹木[1] 陈志仁[1]
出 处:《吉林医学》2009年第21期2556-2558,共3页Jilin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:评价64排VCTXT前瞻性心电门控低剂量技术对冠状动脉成像的能力及图像质量分析。方法:连续选取152例行冠状动脉CTA检查的患者(A组平均体重指数25.1,心率<65次/min)行前门控扫描,根据患者的自动毫安量选择管电流及管电压。同时比较回归性心电门控螺旋扫描的30例患者(B组平均体重指数25.7,心率<72次/min)的剂量,并对两组图像质量进行评价(配对t检验,P<0.005为差异有统计学意义)。结果:A组前瞻性门控横断面扫描冠状动脉成像射线剂量平均为(2.75±0.95)mSv,所获图像质量完全达到临床诊断需要,B组回顾性心电门控螺旋扫描冠状动脉成像平均剂量为(18.2±2.9)mSv。B组与A组比较差异有统计学意义,射线剂量减少了85.2%。结论:64排VCTXT前瞻性心电门控技术横断面扫描能满足临床诊断需要,同时也非常有效的降低了辐射剂量。Objective To compare radiation dose and image quality between prospective electocardiograph-triggered axial scan and retrospective ECG-gatechelical scan in coronary 64-slice CT angiography(CTA).Method Total 152 consecutive patients:group A:Average body mass index(BMI):25.1,heart rate〈65 bpm underwent 64-slice CTA.Using prospective ECG-triggered axial scan protal(120kV automA preference);group B:Average body mass index(BMI):25.7,heart rate〈72 bpm.The image quality was blindly evaluated between group A and group ,B (paired test was used and P 〈 0. 05 as a significant difference). Results There was significant difference ( t = 18.5, P 〈 0.01 ) between radiation dose of group A [ ( 2. 75 ±0.95 ) mSv ] and that of group B [ ( 18.2 ±2. 9 ) mSv ], decreased by 85.2%. The image quality of group A could fulfill clinical diagnosis needs. The average radiation dose of using helical scan without optimi- zation was 17.29 mSv which was similar to that of group B ( 18. 13 mSv). Conclusion Prospetive ECG - trigered axial scan in 64 - slice coronary CTA can significantly reduce radiation exposure and the image quality can fulfill clinical diagnosis needs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145