WTO知识产权争端解决实践十三年:回顾与评述  

An Empirical Research on the WTO IPR Dispute Settlement Practices in the Past Thirteen Years

作　　者：李晓玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《国际经贸探索》2009年第11期70-75,共6页International Economics and Trade Research

摘　　要：WTO成立后,其争端解决机制获得普遍赞扬,也因此掩盖了一些内在问题。对WTO知识产权争端的实证研究表明,至少在本领域,"权力导向"仍在起作用。作为乌拉圭回合产生的新协定,《TRIPS协定》并不完备,在"非违反之诉"的适用、WTO与WIPO的合作与协调等体制性问题上,仍有很大的不确定性。知识产权问题本身的敏感性和复杂性,也彰显了WTO争端解决机制中普遍存在的参与问题。Universal praises won by the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism（DSM） conceal lots of inherent problems. An empirical research shows that ＂power orientation＂ still works at least in IPR cases. As a new agreement created in the Uruguay Round, the TRIPS Agreement isn＇ t perfect. Systematic issues, such as the applicability of non-violation actions and the coordination between WTO and WIPO, are legally uncertain. Moreover, the sensitiveness and complexity of IPR issue highlight the issue of participation in the DSM.

关 键 词：争端解决机制 知识产权 非违反之诉 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]