检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王云多[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江大学经济与工商管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080
出 处:《人口与经济》2009年第6期42-46,共5页Population & Economics
摘 要:通过对2005年问卷调查数据的分析,参照墨菲和韦尔茨提出的人力资本收益率测量方法,对中国教育明瑟收益率的地区、行业和性别差异进行了统计性检验,并给予了解释。研究发现,行业差别是影响个人教育收益率的主要因素,垄断行业教育收益率最低,国家机关和事业单位教育收益率次之,竞争性行业教育收益率最高。就地区和性别因素而言,中、西部地区教育收益率高于东部地区教育收益率,女性教育收益率高于男性教育收益率。Based on an analysis of the data acquired in a questionnaire survey in 2005, and referring to the measuring method of human capital earning rate put forward by Murphy and Welch, the paper makes a statistic test to the differences of Mincer earning rate of China's education that exist between different regions, industries and genders, and explains the reasons behind these differences. The research shows that industry is the leading factor affecting individual's educational earning rate, which is the lowest in monopoly industries, followed by state organs and institutions, and is the highest in competitiveness industries. From the aspects of region and gender, the education earning rate of middle and west China is higher than that of east China, while the rate of women is higher than that of men.
分 类 号:F061.5[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.79