检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖艳秋[1] 徐洋[1] 鲁鸿燕[1] 白琳[1] 栾钊[1] 张琳琳[1]
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志(下旬版)》2009年第11期67-69,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的观察健康教育干预对骨质疏松性骨折患者生活质量的影响。方法入选248例骨质疏松眭骨折住院患者,按人院顺序随机分为对照组123例和于预组125例。对照组患者在骨质疏松性骨折患者骨科常规治疗基础上行骨科住院常规护理,干预组在骨质疏松性骨折住院患者骨科常规治疗与护理基础上实施指导学习骨质疏松基本知识、心理疏导、用药指导、饮食指导、康复训练指导、对家属的指导等健康教育干预措施。观察和比较干预前后2组患者生活质量(QOL)评分的差异。结果经过健康教育干预后,干预组的QOL评分均明显改善,显著优于对照组,干预组的临床疗效显著好于对照组,且住院时间显著短于对照组。结论健康教育干预能够改善骨质疏松性骨折患者的生活质量,有助于增强临床疗效,缩短住院时间。Objective To know the influence of health education on the quality of life of patients with fracture because of osteopomsis. Methods Divided 248 patients with fracture because of osteoporosis into the control group( 123 cases) and the intervention group( 125 cases) according to the consequence in hospital. Routine treatment and nursing cares were used in the control group, while the nursing intervention were used in the intervention group, such as relative knowledge education, psychological treatment, nutrition guidance and rehabilitation guidance. Compared the quality of life between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results After the intervention, the quality of life in the intervention group was significant better than in the control group, the course of in hospital was shorter than in the control group, the curative effects was better than in the control group. Conclusions Health education can effective improve the quality of life of patients with fracture because of osteoporosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80