检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺平[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学国际问题研究院日本研究中心,上海200433
出 处:《复旦学报(社会科学版)》2009年第6期91-97,共7页Fudan Journal(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(项目批准号:08BG5019);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(项目批准号:06JAGJW003);复旦大学亚洲研究中心2009年度资助项目<日本的东亚经济合作战略>的资助
摘 要:在多边贸易体制的框架下,战后日美贸易争端解决机制由双边领域的"规则导向型"谈判向克林顿政府前期的"结果导向型"谈判倾斜,在20世纪90年代后期又逐渐转向多边和双边并重的"规则导向型"谈判。多边规则与国际法在日本这一"非诉讼社会"不断内化。WTO成立之后,日本在应对与美贸易摩擦中日益显示出"进攻性法律主义"的特征。上述转变是日本努力成为"正常国家"和"普通国家"并寻求更为平等和独立的对美关系的表现之一,也是战后日美关系整体变化的一个缩影。In the multilateral trading system, the dispute settlement mechanism of US-Japan trade conflicts underwent a gradual transition in the postwar period, namely from a bilateral rule-oriented approach to a result-oriented approach in the early days of Clinton administration and finally to a rule-oriented approach attaching dual importance to bilateralism and muhilateralism. Multilateral rules and international laws have been constantly internalized in Japan's traditional "non-litigious society. " Ever since the establishment of the WTO, the "aggressive legalism" has increasingly been one of Japan's characteristics in dealing with its trade conflicts with the United States. "normal state" and its pursuit of an equal and more This phenomenon reflects Japan's endeavors to be a independent relationship with the U.S. This could also be regarded as an epitome of the changing US-Japan relations as a whole.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.128.223