现象学研究：批评与回应  

Phenomenological Research:Critism and Response

作　　者：洛伦.巴里特 托恩.比克曼 汉斯.布利克 卡雷尔.马尔德 刘洁 

机构地区：[1]美国密歇根大学 [2]中央教育科学研究所 [3]首都师范大学教育科学学院

出　　处：《教育研究》2009年第11期41-47,共7页Educational Research

摘　　要：许多人对现象学的观点持批评态度,他们认为,再现一个体验的描述性研究太难了,现象学研究过于主观,研究者的偏见影响结果的公正,进行现象学研究没有程序指导,现象学研究往往基于受访对象的记忆,等等。然而,现象学研究要求从一系列共享观点中提出明确而令人信服的证据,以最恰切的词语展现清晰的论证;现象学研究的目的是如实描述出别人所经历的体验,现象学除主观性之外别无选择;现象学研究要求我们对自己诚实,并把读者也引向那种诚实。Many people hold a critical attitude toward the viewpoints of phenomenology. They think that it is too difficult to duplicate an experienced description research, since phenomenological research is too subjective, as a result, the prejudice of researchers will influence the equity of the results, and since there is no guidance on sequences while carrying out the phenomenological research, the phenomenological research will often base on the memory of the interviewees, etc. However, the phenomenological research requires that clear and convincing evidence should be put forward from a series of sharing viewpoints, with the most apposite words to demonstrate clearly; the phenomenological research aims to faithfully describe the experience, as a result, phenomenology has no other choice than subjectivity; the phenomenological research needs you to be honest with yourselves and lead the readers to that kind of honesty.

关 键 词：现象学 描述性研究 可重复性 主观性 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]