检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付阳[1] 霍萃萌[2] 姜垒[1] 朱琰[1] 任志勇[1]
机构地区:[1]河南省科学院高新技术研究中心,郑州450002 [2]河南省科学院化学研究所有限公司,郑州450002
出 处:《河南科学》2009年第12期1520-1523,共4页Henan Science
摘 要:分别采用高效凝胶渗透色谱(HLGPC)法和多角度激光光散射-凝胶渗透色谱法(MALLS/GPC)法测定了分子量为10万以上氯化聚丙烯(CPP)的分子量及其分布,并据此对两种测定高聚物分子量的方法进行了初步对比分析.结果表明,两种测定方法得到的高聚物分子量相差小于1%,分布相差约2%.与传统的GPC法相比,MALLS法可获得重均分子量的绝对值,因而与GPC联用可获得更加符合样品实际分子量分布的结果.Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)and Multi-angle Laser Light Scattered combined with GPC (GPC/ MALLS) were used to determine the molecular weight and its distribution of chlorinated polypropylene (CPP) with molecular weight of over 100,000. The two kinds of molecular weight determination methods for polymer were then priliminarily compared based on the results. It is shown that the difference of the molecular weight obtahed by the two methods is less than 1% while that of molecular weight distribution is about 2 %. Compared with the traditional GPC method, the MALLS method can be used to obtain the absolute weight-average molecular weight, therefore the molecular weight distribution ontained by combination with GPC method can also be more consistent with true case in the polymer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143