检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孔梅[1] 张尤历[1] 何亚龙[1] 张宇川[1] 许云飞[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏大学医学院附属医院,江苏镇江212001
出 处:《现代医药卫生》2009年第24期3684-3685,共2页Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
基 金:江苏省社会发展项目(BS2006041)资助
摘 要:目的:比较内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)和磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)对胆管梗阻性疾病的诊断价值。方法:通过ERCP和MRCP影像资料对132例胆管梗阻进行对比分析。结果:诊断结果表明,两者一致的117例(88.6%),不一致13例(9.8%),总符合率MR-CP为88.6%,ERCP为98.4%。患者行MRCP后无并发症,但行ERCP检查后有9例出现并发症,发生率为6.8%,但无死亡病例。结论:MRCP在胆管梗阻性疾病诊断方面具有操作简便、安全、无创伤性,经济实惠等优点,诊断胆总管扩张的敏感性及准确性较高,但对胆总管较小结石(<3 mm)的诊断不如ERCP准确,而且不能行取石治疗。因此MRCP在对胆管梗阻性疾病的诊断中应作为首选方法,但不能取代ERCP,两者需结合。Objective :To compare the diagnostic values of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and MR cholangiopancreatography(MRCP) for the malignant obstruction diseases of biliary tract. Methods:The parallel analysis for the ERCP and MRCP data of 132 patients with biliary obstruction confirmed by surgery and/or ERCP was retrospectively carried out.Results:All the 132 patients with the same diagnosis based on MRCP and ERCP was117 patients (88.6%). The different diagnosis was in 13 patients (9.8%). Conclusion: MRCP has a noninvasive diagnostic value of producing high quality imagines of bile duct and pancreatic tract. MRCP has a high sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of the bile duct and pancreatic tract. The efficacy of MRCP is sufficient to justify its use in the diagnosis of bile duct and pancreatic tract diseases, but not to replace ERCP perfectly.
关 键 词:磁共振胰胆管造影 经内镜逆行胰胆管造影 胰胆系疾病
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200