垄断执法今何在——从“民航涨价案”看反垄断执法不作为  

Nonfeasance of Anti-monopoly Law:A Case Study of the Airfare Price Hike

作　　者：孟繁盛[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2009年第5期59-62,共4页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：2009年4月20日起,中国的航空公司不约而同地采用了新的机票折扣方式,使得机票价格上浮。一石激起千层浪,这件事引起了社会的广泛关注,新生效的《反垄断法》自然也被牵扯其中。一时间,对本案的猜测之声不绝于耳,究竟是谁偷吃了"禁果"?这似乎是一个难以回答的问题。如果不是出于于"玩猜谜游戏",而是从本案的现知事实出发,就应该得出该案存在涉嫌违反《反垄断法》、有关执法机关在其中存在不作为的问题。对此,应采取对策加以治理。Since 20th April, China airline companies coincidently adopted new ways of ticket discount which caused the airfare price hike. This issue arouses great public concern, and the new anti-monopoly law is inevitably involved in it. The public is interested in guessing who eats the ＂forbidden fruit＂. Having no inten- tion to answer the question, the present study based on the known facts, draws the conclusion that the case is suspected to violate the anti-monopoly law, and the justice organs commit nonfeasance. Finally, a series of correlative countermeasures are brought forward.

关 键 词：民航涨价 反垄断法 执法 不作为 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学] F724.722[政治法律—法学]