“无死刑之动议,不得死刑之裁判”——谈检察机关之死刑动议权  

"There Is no Death Penalty Prosecution Request,the Court Shall not Apply to Death Sentences": The Prosecution of the Death Penalty

作　　者：谌东华 

机构地区：[1]湖南省临澧县林业局,湖南临澧415200

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第4期48-53,共6页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：从死刑量刑和判罚来看,明确死刑的动议和提高死刑之适用标准为限制死刑之必须:一是确立"无死刑主张不裁判"之原则,明确只有公诉机关提出适用死刑或执行死缓之主张请求,法院方可进行死刑适用的裁判;二是实行死刑案件两次开庭之特别审理程序,赋予检察机关死刑动议权,由其在开庭前或法庭审理时以起诉书的方式提出,并相应提高死刑适用的标准。因此建议在立法中加入"没有公诉方死刑之请求,法院不得适用死刑裁判"之条款。From the death penalty view, clearly moved by the death penalty and raising the standard to limit the application of the death penalty the death penalty must： First, to establish ＂no-death penalty advocates do not referee,＂ the principle, clearly only the public prosecutor made the claim for death or death with reprieve request, the court may carry out the death penalty applies to referees; second is the implementation of the two special sessions of the death penalty proceedings, giving prosecutors the right to move the death penalty, by the trial court before or at trial to the indictment made in such manner, and a corresponding increase in the death penalty applicable standards. Therefore proposed in the legislation by adding ＂there is no death penalty prosecution request, the court shall not apply to death sentences. ＂

关 键 词：死刑动议 死刑主张 死刑裁判 两次开庭 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]