两种吸痰方式在经口腔无创吸痰中的对比研究  

Study for the effects of two different methods of sputum drainage

作　　者：王丹[1] 张小冯[1] 

机构地区：[1]解放军总医院呼吸科,北京100853

出　　处：《护士进修杂志》2009年第23期2121-2122,共2页Journal of Nurses Training

摘　　要：目的观察比较两种不同吸痰方式在无创吸痰中的效果。方法将行无创吸痰的32例患者随机分为观察组和对照组,分别采用经口咽通气管吸痰法(观察组)和经鼻腔/口直接吸痰法(对照组)吸痰。比较两种方法的吸痰效果、吸痰次数和总量、并发症的发生以及吸痰方法对血氧饱和度的影响。结果观察组的吸痰效果、吸痰次数和总量、并发症的发生以及吸痰方法对血氧饱和度的影响与对照组相比均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论经口咽通气管吸痰法比经口直接吸痰法更能减轻患者的痛苦,减少临床护理工作量,提高护理质量。Objective To observe and compare the effects of two different sputum drainage methods. Method 32 patients were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group was sputum drainage through oropharyngeal airway. The control group was sputum drainage through nasal cavity directly. The effect of sputum drainage, the time and the quantity of sputum drainage in 24 hours, and the effects on blood oxygen saturation of the two methods of sputum drainage were observed and compared. Result The time and the quantity of sputum drainage in 24 hours, the effect of mucous membrane, and the effects of the two methods of sputum drainage on the blood oxygen saturation was significantly different between two methods （P〈0. 05）. Conclusion Sputum drainage through oropharyngeal airway is more effective than through nasal cavity directly for improving the quality of nursing.

关 键 词：吸痰 口咽通气管 血氧饱和度 护理 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]