检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院.中国协和医科大学.药用植物研究所云南分所,云南景洪666100
出 处:《时珍国医国药》2009年第12期2944-2946,共3页Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research
基 金:中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项
摘 要:目的对比铁皮石斛与其常用替代品在品质方面的差异。方法采用苯酚-硫酸法与重量法,研究对比了西双版纳地区不同来源铁皮石斛及齿瓣石斛多糖含量及折干率的差异。结果铁皮石斛的多糖含量及折干率分别为20.29%,20.16%,齿瓣石斛为16.93%,18.92%。结论不同栽培类型的铁皮石斛存在品质差异;齿瓣石斛的野生苗品质优于组培苗。Objective To compare the difference of quality between Derutrobium candidurn and Dendrobium devonianum. Methods Phenol - Sulphate Acid method and gravimetrict method were used to measure polysaccharides contents from Dendrobium and their weights after baking. Results The polysaccharides content and drying rate of Dendrobiurn candidum were 20.29% ,20.16% respectively, that of Dendrobium devortianurn 16.93%, 18.92% separately. Conclusion The cultivated type of Dendrobium candidum is significantly different in quality. The quality of natural seedling of Dendrobium devonianum is superior to that of tissue culture seedling.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28