检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯峰
机构地区:[1]广东省佛山市南海区社会福利中心康复医院,广东佛山528226
出 处:《海南医学院学报》2009年第12期1586-1588,共3页Journal of Hainan Medical University
基 金:海南医学院科研基金资助学报项目(0020090281)~~
摘 要:目的:探讨压疮的临床特点及治疗方法。方法:回顾分析103例患者临床资料,并比较不同局部治疗方法的有效率。结果:痊愈22例,好转68例,未愈8例,因合并其他疾病死亡5例,总有效率为87.38%。局部换药37例,有效率为78.72%;神灯照射+湿润烧伤膏+局部换药15例,有效率为93.75%;超激光治疗仪照射+庆大霉素+局部换药18例,有效率为94.74%;氧气疮面治疗+神灯照射+庆大霉素+局部换药20例,有效率为95.24%。局部换药组与其他3种局部治疗方法组有效率比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论:对压疮的局部治疗选用多种方法联合治疗效果好,值得临床推广。Objective:To explore the clinic character and treatment of pressure sore. Methods: Retrospectively analyzed clinic data of 103 cases,and compared the efficacy of different local treatment. Results: 22 cases were in cure,68 cases were improved,8 cases were ineffective,5 cases were dead due to complication with total efficacy as 87.38%. 37 cases had dressing changing with efficacy as 78.82%,15 cases were treated by light radiation,moisture plaster application for burns and local dressing changing with efficacy as 93.75%, 18 cases were treated by super laser radiation, gentamicin and local dressing changing with efficacy as 94.74%, 20 cases were treated by oxygen therapy, light radiation, gentamiein and local dressing changing with efficacy as 95.24%. The difference between group with local dressing changing and groups other local therapy was significant (P 〈0.05). Conclusion : Combined local therapy for pressure sore is effective, and deserves extensive clinic applieation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15