必须正确理解“防卫适时性”的法律规定——由两个相似案件判决引发的思考  

Must Right Comprehension "defend the well timed" of Law Provision——becaused by two alike cases verdict of consider

作　　者：曾庆金[1] 

机构地区：[1]嘉应学院社会科学部,广东梅州514015

出　　处：《学理论》2009年第30期151-152,共2页Theory Research

摘　　要：相似的防卫案件,有的法院认定为正当防卫,有的法院判防卫人有罪,这源于对"正当防卫"法律规定的理解不同。正当防卫争议的焦点有两个:一是防卫适时性问题,二是防卫必要限度问题。本文只探讨防卫适时性问题。理解"防卫适时性"的法律规定,必须把握法律的正确导向:站在有利于保护防卫人合法权益的立场上,真正体现广大人民群众的意愿。人民法院的判决,要做到以事实为依据,以法律为准绳,客观、公正。既保护受害人权益,又惩罚罪犯的违法行为。Resemble of defend the case, the court that have affirms for proper defend, the court that have judges to defend person＇s guilty, this come from to＂ proper defend＂ the comprehension of the law provision is different.lt is proper to defend the focus that disputes has two：An is to defend the well timed problem, two is to defend the necessary limit problem. This text inquiries in to defend the well timed problem only.Comprehend＂ defend the well timed＂ of the law rules, must hold the exactitude of the law leads to：Stands to defend the legal rights in person at the protection that benefit to the position top, real now mass will in large people.The verdict of the court of the people, absoluteness can＇t in objectively the long scoundrel＇s improbity power and prestige, sweep the hero ambition of the good man!

关 键 词：不法侵害 防卫适时性 时空论 保护法益论 法律导向 

分 类 号：D920.4[政治法律—法学]