检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李泰山[1]
出 处:《苏州教育学院学报》2009年第4期73-76,共4页Journal of Suzhou College of Education
摘 要:知识产权行政保护制度是多年以来在我国的知识产权保护实践中逐步形成的。对于这一特色是否要保留,学界存在较大争议。无论从法律制度和基础、行政保护的现实需要、自身特点和优势的角度看,还是从行政保护与司法保护比较等角度看,该制度都应当予以保留并不断进行改进和完善,而不是废除。The administrative protection system of intellectual property rights (IPR) has a long history and is greatly indebted to the IPR practice in the past decades in China. However, it has led to a dispute in the academic field, as to whether it should be preserved or not. It is argued in this article that the protection system should be preserve and from the perspectives of legal system and foundation, its significance, own characteristics and advantages, a comparison between the administrative protection and legal protection. This article fully reveals the necessisty of the system being preserved and constantly improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28