检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋鸣湄[1]
出 处:《广西民族研究》2009年第4期148-153,共6页GUANGXI ETHNIC STUDIES
基 金:云南大学胡兴东副教授主持的“国家社科基金项目”《西南少数民族地区多元纠纷解决机制与和谐社会构建:以法律社会学为视角》(项目批准号07CFX036)的阶段性成果之一
摘 要:作者对三江侗族民间多元化纠纷解决机制的运行状况以及以村规民约为代表的社会契约、村委会及老人协会调处为代表的社会救济方式的地位和作用进行了考察,论述了纠纷解决机制是一个包括程序和实体法实践在内的动态体系;揭示社会自治力在国家现阶段不被重视,纠纷解决机制的多元化选择空间较小的社会现实;倡导重视社会契约和社会救济以激励社会自治。The writer investigates the operation of diversified dispute - solving mechanism in Sanjiang Dong' s modem civil society, the status and function of social contract represented by village roles and customs, and social almsgiving manners represented by mediation of village committee and the association for the elderly. The paper expounds and proves that dispute - solving mechanism is a dynamic system which includes procedures and practice of substantial law, and reveals that it is the social reality that social autonomous force is neglected in present period and that there is only small room for choosing diversified dispute - solving mechanisms. Thus, the author advocates paying more importance upon social contract and social almsgiving in order to promote social autonomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229