检察一体化中“上命下从”的限度  

Limitation of Obedience to the Order of Superior Officers in Procuratorate Integration

作　　者：谢小剑[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西财经大学法学院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2009年第4期112-117,共6页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基　　金：谢小剑主持的江西省社会科学"十一五"(2008)规划项目"法律监督理论下检察权的配置"(08FX06)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：目前,我国正在推进的检察一体化改革具有极端性,要求下级检察机关必须绝对服从上级检察机关的指令。但是,域外各国为了防止上级检察官滥权,对指令权进行限制。同时,下级检察官具有相对独立性,对上级检察官的指令有异议权;表示异议后,上级检察官应行使职务承继权或职务移转权;下级检察官违反指令作出的决定依然具有法律效力。我国应当借鉴上述经验,纠正片面强调上级检察机关指令效力的极端化改革。The procuratorate integration being promoted in China currently is extreme and it demands absolute obedience. Contrarily, in order to prevent power abuse, foreign countries impose restrictions on the power to issue orders, that inferior prosecutor is relatively independent and his dissent shall be solved by case substitute or transfer. Decisions made by inferior prosecutor disobey superior orders are still valid. All the above experience should be drawn on to correct the extreme reform of emphasizing the effect of superior orders unilaterally.

关 键 词：检察一体化 检察官 指令权 相对独立 公诉权滥用 

分 类 号：D926.3[政治法律—法学]