检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东南大学,南京210096
出 处:《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》2009年第6期10-14,共5页Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(70473013)
摘 要:在电力零售市场引入实时电价(RTP)制度后,当零售市场还处于配电公司垄断经营的阶段,仍需要对配电公司的零售电价进行规制。作为垄断经营者的配电公司将以利润最大化为目标,但其零售电价将受到不同规制政策的影响。本文以拉姆齐规制政策为标杆,分析了价格上限和收入控制规制两种规制政策对配电公司零售电价的影响。研究表明价格上限规制政策下,零售电价普遍高于拉姆齐定价,而收入控制政策下,配电公司在低谷时段的零售电价将低于拉姆齐定价,而在高峰时段的电价高于拉姆齐定价,通过算例进一步验证了上述结论。The retail electricity of a monopolizing distribution company still have to be regulated after the real-time price (RTP) is utilized in the retail electricity market since the market is monopolized. The distribution will target profit maximization but its retail price is affected by regulation policy. The impacts of the policy of the price cap or revenue control regulation on retail price are analyzed by comparing the affect of the optimal price of Ramsey. The results show that the retail price under the price cap is higher than the one under the Ramsey. The price under the revenue control is lower than the one under the Ramsey in the valley periods, while higher in the peak periods. The example demonstrates the proposed conclusions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.120.229