静脉输液拔针后按压方法的研究  

A study on pressing methods of withdrawal of needles after intravenous transfusion

作　　者：曲慧宇[1] 关桂红[1] 

机构地区：[1]延边大学附属医院手术室,吉林延边133000

出　　处：《局解手术学杂志》2009年第6期393-394,共2页Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery

摘　　要：目的为了最大限度地保护患者血管,探讨静脉输液拔针后局部按压的最佳方法。方法将460例患者随机分成对照组和观察组各230例;对照组采用交换式按压(传统按压法),观察组采用非交换式按压(小鱼际直接按压法);将两组患者是否有局部疼痛、针眼出血、局部淤血或肿胀进行对比观察统计。结果观察组在静脉输液拔针后疼痛、针眼出血、皮下淤血等的发生率明显低于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论静脉输液拔针后采用非交换式按压法明显优于传统的按压法,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the preferred pressing methods of withdrawal of needles after intravenous transfusion for protecting vascellum. Methods Totally 460 cases were randomly divided in control group and observation group,and 230 cases in each one. Interexchange pressing（traditional pressing ） was used in control group,and non-interexchange pressing（hypothenar pressing） was used in observation group. whether or not part pain,pinpoint bleeding,part congestion or engorgement happened in the two groups were statisticed and compared. Results The incidence of pain,pinpoint bleeding and congestion in observation group were obviously lower than that of control group,and had the statistical significance（ P〈 0.01）. Conclusion The method of hypothenar pressing is obviously better than traditional pressing.

关 键 词：静脉输液 拔针 按压方法 

分 类 号：R826.26[医药卫生—临床医学]