诉讼调解:审判经验与法学原理  

Litigation Mediation:Judicial Experience and Jurisprudential Doctrine

作　　者：范愉[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2009年第6期128-137,共10页China Legal Science

基　　金：教育部重大攻关项目"多元化纠纷解决机制与和谐社会的建构"(项目合同号:05JZDH004)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：审判经验来源于司法实践,既不能脱离基本原理和理论的指导和制约,也不能一味固守原理和定律、拒绝回应社会与实践的需求与发展。当代社会对调解正当性的认同实际上已超越和升华了传统法治原理,尤其是逐步脱离了国家中心和诉讼迷信。"调解优先、调判结合"的司法政策,是司法机关立足于我国现行体制和司法环境,应对社会纠纷解决需求而做出的选择,为了保证其目标得以实现,法院应在总结调解实践经验的同时,遵循调解的规律和原理,并注意借鉴其他国家的成功经验,通过不断提高调解的效果和正当性获得社会公众的认同。The trial experience is come from the judicial practice, it can not be without the guidance and constraints of basic principles and theory, but also can not stick the principle blindly refused to respond to the needs of society and the practical development. Contemporary society＇s new idea gives a strong recognition to the legitimacy of mediation, in fact has gone beyond the traditional principle of rule of law, in particular, de- tached from the National Center and the superstition to litigation. The judicial policy of ＂Mediation priority, combining with judgment＂ is based on China＇s current judicial system and judicial environment, respond to the needs of the community dispute resolution. In order to ensure its objectives, the court should be summing up the practical experience of mediation at the same time, according to the discipline and principles of mediation, also learn from the successful experiences of other countries, through continuously improve the effectiveness and legitimacy of the mediation to obtain the recognition of the public.

关 键 词：审判经验 诉讼调解 司法政策 法学原理 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]