表面活性剂对水湿砂岩的渗吸规律及其对采收率的影响  

Imbibition behavior of surfactant in water-wet sandstone and its effects on recovery efficiency

作　　者：韩冬[1] 彭昱强[1,2] 郭尚平[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京100083 [2]中海油田服务股份有限公司,北京101149

出　　处：《中国石油大学学报（自然科学版）》2009年第6期142-147,共6页Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science)

基　　金：国家'973'重点基础研究发展计划项目(2005CB221300)

摘　　要：利用国产露头砂岩岩心,研究水湿条件下盐水、非离子表面活性剂、阴离子表面活性剂和阳离子表面活性剂溶液的自发渗吸规律及其对采收率的影响,对比盐水渗吸、表面活性剂溶液渗吸和先盐水渗吸后表面活性剂溶液的渗吸情况。结果表明:在岩心渗透率范围内,各种溶液渗吸的最终采收率为盐水(0.32～0.50)wOO IP(wOO IP为原始含油量),非离子表面活性剂溶液(0.38～0.50)wOO IP,阴离子表面活性剂溶液(0.44～0.55)wOO IP,阳离子表面活性剂溶液(0.38～0.44)wOO IP;同一类型的非离子表面活性剂在具有特定结构时渗吸效果才达到最好,阴离子表面活性剂的渗吸效果一般好于其他类型表面活性剂;盐水渗吸后再进行表面活性剂渗吸,可提高采收率(0.02～0.04)wOO IP。Spontaneous imbibition behavior of brine, nonionic surfactant solution, anionic surfactant solution, and cationic surfactant solution and its effects on recovery efficiency were studied in water-wet Chinese outcrop sandstones. The imbibition charateristics were compared in brine, surfactant solution, and sequence of brine and surfactant solution. The results show that the ultimate imbibition recovery efficiency of brine is between 0.32 WooiP and 0.50 WoolP, where WootP refers to the original oil-cut, and that of nonionic surfactants is between 0. 38 WOOIP and 0. 50 WOOIP, and that of anionic surfactants is between 0.44 WOOIP and 0.55 WOOIP, and that of cationic surfactants is between 0.38 WOOIP and 0.44WOOIP. The same type of nonionic surfactant with a specific structure could reach the best imbibition results. The imbibition recovery efficiency of anionic sur- factant is generally better than that of any other type surfaetant. Moreover, if cores are first imbibed in brine and then in surfactant solution, the ultimate recovery efficiency will be improved by （0.02 -0.04）WOOIP.

关 键 词：自发渗吸 露头砂岩 水湿岩心 表面活性剂 渗吸采收率 

分 类 号：TE357.46[石油与天然气工程—油气田开发工程]