检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:约翰·弗里德曼[1] 李晓慧(译) 张庭伟(校)[3]
机构地区:[1]加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚大学 [2]武汉市城市规划设计研究院 [3]美国芝加哥伊利诺伊大学
出 处:《国际城市规划》2009年第6期6-14,共9页Urban Planning International
摘 要:人们普遍认为规划理论与规划实践者的相关度不高。本文试图通过展现过去50年里规划理论对规划这个职业的影响,来反驳这种观点。文章提出了理论可以有助于规划工作领域的三种途径(这里的规划领域主要指北美的规划实践和教育)。第一个途径是对规划工作深入的人文主义哲学思考,并且探寻它对规划实践的含义。第二个途径是对规划实践进行调整,使其适应现实世界在尺度、复杂性和时间上的限制。第三个途径是将其他领域的知识和思想通过规划理论转译到规划领域。本文的结论是:规划理论应当被看作是全球学者跨学科的一种努力,他们对规划专业的贡献非常重要。There is a widespread opinion that planning theory is of little relevance to practitioners. This article tries to refute this view by showing the impact that planning theorists have had on the profession during the past 50 years. It suggests three ways, that theorizing can contribute to the field, referring here to both practice and education primarily in North America. The first is by evolving a deeply considered humanist philosophy for planning and tracing its implications for practice. The second is by adapting planning practices to their real-world constraints with regard to scale, complexity, and time. The third is by translating knowledge and ideas generated in other fields into the domain of planning. The article concludes that planning theory needs to be perceived as a transdisciplinary endeavor involving a global community of scholars and that their contributions are vital to profession.
分 类 号:TU981[建筑科学—城市规划与设计] TU984.111
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30