检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省溧阳市人民医院十三病区,江苏溧阳213300
出 处:《临床医学工程》2009年第12期58-60,共3页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
摘 要:目的减少肿瘤患者在治疗过程中反复穿刺采集血标本的痛苦,确保经PICC中取得血标本结果的正确性。方法将PICC置管后肿瘤化疗患者且需要采血的患者20例,采用PICC采血(观察组)和普通静脉穿刺采血(对照组)两种方法同时采集血标本,进行实验室血常规、血生化和肿瘤标志物检查,两组标本结果进行t检验,同时对观察组PICC使用情况进行观察。结果两组血常规、血生化、肿瘤标志物检查结果比较差异无显著性意义(均P>0.05)。无一例导管堵塞、感染等并发症发生。结论应用PICC采集血标本检验结果准确,且不增加PICC并发症。Objective To evaluate the feasibility and superiority of the peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy who need to collect blood specimens repeatedly. Method As 20 cancer patients undergoing long-term chemotherapy were treated via peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC), blood specimens were simultaneously collected both by PICC and ordinary veinpuncture for full blood count (FBC), biochemistry and tumor markers to compare the difference between the two methods. Results There was no difference among the results of those blood examine with the two methods of blood specimens collection (P〉0.05), and none of the complications happened in those patients, such as catheter obstruction, infection, etc. Conclusion The technique of PICC in patients undergoing chemotherapy is effective and safe.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3