检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何波[1] 皮江媛[2] 郭宏磊[1] 贾科锋[1] 宋光义[1] 韩丹[1]
机构地区:[1]昆明医学院附一院医学影像中心,云南昆明650022 [2]昆明医学院,云南昆明650031
出 处:《昆明医学院学报》2009年第11期59-62,共4页Journal of Kunming Medical College
基 金:云南省科技厅青年科研基金资助项目(06Y272C)
摘 要:目的对比研究MSCTU与IVU两种方法对肾集合系统及输尿管显影能力的差别.方法75例患者均行CTU检查,其中62例行IVU检查,将双侧肾集合系统及输尿管各分成4部分,即肾内集合系统、上段输尿管、中段输尿管和下段输尿管,评价MSCTU及IVU对各段的显影情况并做对比分析.结果MSCTU对肾内集合系统及上段、中段输尿管的显影情况优于IVU(P<0.05);MSCTU和IVU对下段输尿管的显示无明显差别(P>0.05).结论MSCTU对于肾集合系统及上、中段输尿管的显影情况优于IVU.Objective To compare the difference in opacifications of the collecting system and ureters between MSCTU and IVU.Methods Seventy-five patients underwent MSCT urography.There were 61 of 75 patients imaged by IVU at the same time.Each collecting system and ureter were divided into four parts(intrarenal,upper,middle and distal ureter),and three independent readers were scored and the difference in opacification of them between MSCTU and IVU was compared.Results The scores of MSCTU were higher than IVU in the intrarenal,middle and upper ureter(P0.05),and the scores of MSCT and IVU were same in the distal ureter.Conclusion The opacification of the collecting system and ureters with MSCTU is superior to that of IVU.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229